Give Up Blog - for scientists like these!


You hid my archives, didn't you Steve!


Maps and Figures

"Hitler or Coulter?" Quiz
Map1 - Teen Pregnancy
Map2 - Incarceration
Map3 - Homicide Rates
Map4 - Drop-out Rates
Map5 - Bankruptcy Rates
Map6 - Driving Distances
Map7 - Energy Use
Map8 - Gonorrhea!
Map9 - Tax Burden
Map10 - State GDP
Map11 - DHS funding
Map12 - Adult Illiteracy.
Map13 - Abortion Bans:
Map14 - ER Quality
Map15 - Hospital Quality
Map16 - Coal Burners
Map 17 - Infant Mortality
Map 18 - Toxic Waste
Map 19 - Obesity
Map 20 - Poverty
Map 21 - Occupational safety
Map 22 - Traffic deaths
Map 23 - Divorce
Figure 1 - Wages vs Right to work
Figure 2 - Unemployment vs Right to work
Give Up Shopping guide

Email



link to xml feed Subscribe with Bloglines

Google


www

giveupblog

Monday, November 14, 2005

Intelligent Design Hypothesis, "takes hold in academia" according to WSJ
I love intelligent design. It is my favorite kind of science, namely, science by analogy. I tell you, I've gotten sick over the years learning molecular techniques, biochemistry, genetics, and all those other things that actually allow me to perform science. Now I find out I don't have learn anything new, apparently everything is already known! And, you don't need to collect data, all you have to do is develop an adequate analogy or stupid gimmick to make your point. The WSJ writes: (sorry nonsubscribers)

AMES, Iowa -- With a magician's flourish, Thomas Ingebritsen pulled six mousetraps from a shopping bag and handed them out to students in his "God and Science" seminar. At his instruction, they removed one component -- either the spring, hammer or holding bar -- from each mousetrap. They then tested the traps, which all failed to snap.

"Is the mousetrap irreducibly complex?" the Iowa State University molecular biologist asked the class.

"Yes, definitely," said Jason Mueller, a junior biochemistry major wearing a cross around his neck.

That's the answer Mr. Ingebritsen was looking for. He was using the mousetrap to support the antievolution doctrine known as intelligent design. Like a mousetrap, the associate professor suggested, living cells are "irreducibly complex" -- they can't fulfill their functions without all of their parts. Hence, they could not have evolved bit by bit through natural selection but must have been devised by a creator.


The only problem I've found with my new love of intelligent design are the hundreds of siRNA experiments I've performed, (siRNAs eliminate expression of a single gene they are targeted against) that don't all kill the cells. If only I didn't know for a fact from my own experiments that all cells aren't irreducibly complex, I could believe they are irreducibly complex and retire. Stupid siRNA.

That and all those knockout mice in the literature that have no phenotype or have non-lethal phenotype. Shit, and I forgot about all those c. elegans, and yeast studies that knockout genes and the damn things survive.

Stupid nature. Now I'll never know everything.

4 Comments:

T. DeLay said...

I like intelligent design. It just makes good sense and why else would we have little toes?

12:54 PM, November 15, 2005

 
Rev. Dr. said...

Man, that's the problem with the internets. You can never tell if sarcasm is being communicated. I mean, did people miss my irony? Is t. delay being ironic now and I'm missing it? We'll never know.

1:56 PM, November 15, 2005

 
Reen said...

Because I find it highly unlikely that the actual Tom Delay is posting to your blog, I think the comment could safely be labeled "ironic."

2:11 PM, November 16, 2005

 
Rev. Dr. said...

Yes, I ran into "t. delay" and this person did indicate they were being ironic. But you never no, it could have been someone who idolizes Tom Delay and goes by his name. Or not.

11:13 PM, November 20, 2005

 

Post a Comment

<< Home