Give Up Blog - for scientists like these!


You hid my archives, didn't you Steve!


Maps and Figures

"Hitler or Coulter?" Quiz
Map1 - Teen Pregnancy
Map2 - Incarceration
Map3 - Homicide Rates
Map4 - Drop-out Rates
Map5 - Bankruptcy Rates
Map6 - Driving Distances
Map7 - Energy Use
Map8 - Gonorrhea!
Map9 - Tax Burden
Map10 - State GDP
Map11 - DHS funding
Map12 - Adult Illiteracy.
Map13 - Abortion Bans:
Map14 - ER Quality
Map15 - Hospital Quality
Map16 - Coal Burners
Map 17 - Infant Mortality
Map 18 - Toxic Waste
Map 19 - Obesity
Map 20 - Poverty
Map 21 - Occupational safety
Map 22 - Traffic deaths
Map 23 - Divorce
Figure 1 - Wages vs Right to work
Figure 2 - Unemployment vs Right to work
Give Up Shopping guide

Email



link to xml feed Subscribe with Bloglines

Google


www

giveupblog

Friday, December 23, 2005

The Ghost of Tom Daschle
Daschle has re-emerged, as if from the dead, to blow apart the Bush administration and Justice Department's defense of domestic spying using the NSA.

To those not aware of these developments, here's what has happened in the last few weeks. The Bush administration, in response to the NYT article disclosing that their use of the NSA to spy on Americans making overseas calls claimed that the Congressional authorization for the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq gave him the power to do this. Subsequent revelations in the post indicated beyond listening in to international communications, the spying also extended to purely domestic communications. The Justice Department came out with a totally bogus "constitutional" justification of the president's new powers which are completely contradicted by legislation such as FISA, and claim that when congress authorized military force they also effectively made Bush a dictator who could then violate any law as he saw fit. Really, that's what this boils down to. They are saying that congress, by authorizing military force also "implied" that Bush could then do whatever he wants, whenever he wants in the name of protecting the nation. Where have we heard this before.

Anyway, the news today is that Tom Daschle has proof that this interpretation, besides being completely absurd to any reasonable patriotic American who believes in the rule of law, is also completely made up. The Bush administration asked for the power that they now claim was implied in the authorization, and congress rejected it. So, they rejected the language that would have given this president the power that he now claims they "implied" by giving him military authorization.

So, now the question is what shall we start calling Bush to reflect his new dictatorial status? If you can read any act of congress as "implying" that you have expansive executive powers, even when they specifically rejected such powers, then you are a dictator, no?

I would appreciate suggestions on his new dictator title. So far I've only come up with the rather tired and hackneyed BushenFuhrer. Please help!

1 Comments:

Anonymous said...

Idi Amin Dada had a good one. It's a little clumsy, but maybe we can come up with a variant on this: His Excellency President for Life Field Marshal Al Hadji Dr. Idi Amin, VC, DSO, MC, Lord of All the Beasts of the Earth and Fishes of the Sea and Conqueror of the British Empire in Africa in General and Uganda in Particular.

--Jeff

8:21 PM, December 26, 2005

 

Post a Comment

<< Home