Give Up Blog - for scientists like these!


You hid my archives, didn't you Steve!


Maps and Figures

"Hitler or Coulter?" Quiz
Map1 - Teen Pregnancy
Map2 - Incarceration
Map3 - Homicide Rates
Map4 - Drop-out Rates
Map5 - Bankruptcy Rates
Map6 - Driving Distances
Map7 - Energy Use
Map8 - Gonorrhea!
Map9 - Tax Burden
Map10 - State GDP
Map11 - DHS funding
Map12 - Adult Illiteracy.
Map13 - Abortion Bans:
Map14 - ER Quality
Map15 - Hospital Quality
Map16 - Coal Burners
Map 17 - Infant Mortality
Map 18 - Toxic Waste
Map 19 - Obesity
Map 20 - Poverty
Map 21 - Occupational safety
Map 22 - Traffic deaths
Map 23 - Divorce
Figure 1 - Wages vs Right to work
Figure 2 - Unemployment vs Right to work
Give Up Shopping guide

Email



link to xml feed Subscribe with Bloglines

Google


www

giveupblog

Wednesday, December 28, 2005

A Proposed "First Law of Presidential Politics"
What two things do the following statements have in common?

"I am not a crook"
"Read my lips - no new taxes"
"I did not have sexual relations with that woman"
"We do not torture"

Answer: They're all short, declarative statements given by a president (or soon-to-be president). And they're all 100% dead wrong. As in flat out lies.

So here's the new rule:

If a president declares something, emphatically, in a manner of the above, he (or she) is automatically assumed to be lying until proven otherwise. Even if he (or she) is of your party, you must assume that she (or he) is lying his (or her) to our collective faces.

Discuss. Other examples are welcome, as well as corrolaries or contradictory statements that could help us refine this law.

1 Comments:

Rev. Dr. said...

I think what it reflects is instances when members of the press have pinned down the president. In each case, there was just no getting away from the question, and the president in each case then lied (or fudged the truth).

It is therefore interesting that when Bush finally gave his "We do not torture" line it was in one of the very few unscripted press briefings, to foreign journalists, who would not let him off the hook.

So, one wonders whether a requirement of a free and independent press should be the mandate that presidents must expose themselves to questions, unfiltered, every once in a while.

11:28 AM, December 29, 2005

 

Post a Comment

<< Home