Rev. Dr., explain to us how this
article in the New York Times supports the Give Up theme:
Using M.R.I. scanners, neuroscientists have now tracked what happens in the politically partisan brain when it tries to digest damning facts about favored candidates or criticisms of them. The process is almost entirely emotional and unconscious, the researchers report, and there are flares of activity in the brain's pleasure centers when unwelcome information is being rejected.
"Everything we know about cognition suggests that, when faced with a contradiction, we use the rational regions of our brain to think about it, but that was not the case here," said Dr. Drew Westen, a psychologist at Emory and lead author of the study, to be presented Saturday at meetings of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology in Palm Springs, Calif.
[...]
Researchers have long known that political decisions are strongly influenced by unconscious emotional reactions, a fact routinely exploited by campaign consultants and advertisers. But the new research suggests that for partisans, political thinking is often predominantly emotional.
1 Comments:
Pffft.
That's what I think. The assumption is made that every time you hear some partisan jackass like Count Novakula spout off that you should carefully consider what he has to say and reevaluate the political positions you've made over the course of your lifetime.
This is just silly. Every time you hear an idea you don't reformulate what you think from scratch. Of course you're going to have a gestalt response to what you think is idiocy. Besides they purposefully delivered the questions in the most obnoxious way possible. Surprise surprise, people aren't as irritated with obnoxious people if they agree with them.
10:35 AM, January 25, 2006
Post a Comment
<< Home