I didn't say it, Scalia did. Sheesh.

So to my lawyer friends who are all idiots (because I've never met a lawyer who actually was an originalist like this jackass) please provide examples of Scalia violating his so-called originalist principles. I know they exist, that is, cases Scalia has decided based on his personal preferences and religous convictions rather than this strict originalist bullshit.

Any time Scalia says he has a unifying theory of law you know it's BS. At least Thomas is consistently an idiot and I would believe him if he said he had a unified legal approach to all problems. Scalia just decides cases how Scalia wants.

Also, to the general lay public. Let's try to think of this originalist world that Scalia envisions. Would Brown v. Board of Education been decided the same? Would we have Miranda rights or court-appointed lawyers? Would Bush have been elected president if Scalia had fucking decided to obey the constitution and leave the elections up to the state courts as the constitution directs him to?

I guess I just answered my own questions.