The Democratic primary for the Virginia Senate race is this Tuesday. As the lucky residents of a battleground region, we've been getting fliers. Lots of fliers. At least 2-3 a day, for each of us, sometimes multiple different fliers a day for the same candidate. So many fliers that we have to have a separate trash bag just for the Senate candidate fliers.
The problem? Both guys seem like enormous douchebags. On one hand, there's the former corporate lobbyist who sends out vast quantities of negative attack ads, baseless pandering (my personal fave - "Which candidate can women count on" - I wish I could post the pictures on the front), meaningless endorsements, and no actual substansive proposals.
On the other hand, there's the former Republican who sends out vast quantities of negative attack ads, meaningless endorsements, and no actual substansive proposals.
Now, I have no problem with former Republicans. Many of us here were Republicans once. But we got our heads out of our asses long ago, in our early youth. This guy was actively campaigning for Bush, Allen, et al just a couple of years ago. So it seems more like opportunism than a genuine change of philosophy. I realize that Kos is endorsing him, but meaningless endorsements that aren't backed by any proposals of substance just leave me cold.
So what are our options? Hold our noses and vote? Then we're just perpetuating the problems of shitty candidates pulling shitty campaign tricks. Not show up? Again, I don't like that idea, either. What about go to the polls, sign in, then either leave the ballot blank or write in a clear protest (e.g. not "Micky Mouse").
It's kind of a tough call. This is a off-year election, and a primary at that. Poll turnout will be miserable, at best. Moreover, most of the contributors here are impossible to poll - we're young, educated, somewhat affluent, and totally off the radar of traditional polling (no landlines, don't respond to canvassing, etc.). Not showing up says that we don't care. Showing up and leaving it blank says that we want better candidates. And since it's going to be a low-turnout election, our voices have a real chance to be amplified.
Comments?
3 Comments:
I'm thinking of voting for Webb.
I saw them on some talking head show a few days ago and they didn't substantively disagree on any particular issue. Since I don't watch commercials (hooray tivo) I haven't been exposed to the negative attack stuff.
In this case I see Webb as the better candidate to beat Allen, which is the real goal. Allen after all, is one of the truly evil potential candidates for the presidency in 2008. That whole thing with his California Southern pride, confederate flags, nooses, and stories from his siblings talking about how he tortured them as children is enough to convince me he is the most unwholesome person to run for national office in a long time. I know that type of person, they shouldn't be in charge of anything, except maybe the local chapter of the klan.
If Webb can hand Allen a defeat before he even is in the running for president that would be a pretty powerful sign. That's why Kos endorses him too I'm sure.
12:27 PM, June 11, 2006
AAP:
I'm with you--I've writing in for J. Saramago.
4:04 PM, June 12, 2006
You know, I'm so embarrassed, I didn't get the Seeing reference until the Saramago comment. And I bought the book!
I guess I better get around to reading it.
11:56 AM, June 13, 2006
Post a Comment
<< Home