Give Up Blog - for scientists like these!


You hid my archives, didn't you Steve!


Maps and Figures

"Hitler or Coulter?" Quiz
Map1 - Teen Pregnancy
Map2 - Incarceration
Map3 - Homicide Rates
Map4 - Drop-out Rates
Map5 - Bankruptcy Rates
Map6 - Driving Distances
Map7 - Energy Use
Map8 - Gonorrhea!
Map9 - Tax Burden
Map10 - State GDP
Map11 - DHS funding
Map12 - Adult Illiteracy.
Map13 - Abortion Bans:
Map14 - ER Quality
Map15 - Hospital Quality
Map16 - Coal Burners
Map 17 - Infant Mortality
Map 18 - Toxic Waste
Map 19 - Obesity
Map 20 - Poverty
Map 21 - Occupational safety
Map 22 - Traffic deaths
Map 23 - Divorce
Figure 1 - Wages vs Right to work
Figure 2 - Unemployment vs Right to work
Give Up Shopping guide

Email



link to xml feed Subscribe with Bloglines

Google


www

giveupblog

Wednesday, August 23, 2006

Screwing science
Via the Panda's thumb and The Chronicle of Higher Education (subscription) is the latest way Republicans are screwing science. Apparently in the distribution of federal "smart grants" for promoting science education most majors are covered, but strikingly evolutionary biology is absent. And not just absent, as in not mentioned, but it looks like a glaring hole in the application as if it had been excised.

Like a gap in the fossil record, evolutionary biology is missing from a list of majors that the U.S. Department of Education has deemed eligible for a new federal grant program designed to reward students majoring in engineering, mathematics, science, or certain foreign languages.

That absence apparently indicates that students in the evolutionary sciences do not qualify for the grants, and some observers are wondering whether the omission was deliberate.
...
The awards in question -- known as Smart Grants, for the National Science and Mathematics Access to Retain Talent program -- were created by Congress this year, with strong support from the president. The grants are worth up to $4,000 and are awarded in addition to Pell grants.

Recipients must be college juniors or seniors enrolled in one of the technical fields of study that the Department of Education has deemed eligible for funds. Many different topics, as varied as astronomy and Arabic, qualify.

But evolutionary biology is absent.

The department has an index of classification numbers -- referred to as "CIP codes," for the Classification of Instructional Programs -- for all academic areas of instruction,

Under that classification scheme, there is a heading for "Ecology, Evolution, Systematics and Population Biology," under which 10 biological fields are defined. For instance, ecology is 26.1301, and evolutionary biology is 26.1303.

But on a list that defines majors eligible for the grants, issued by the department in May, one of those 10 is missing. On that list, the classification numbers rise in order from 26.1301 to 26.1309 -- with the exception of a blank line where 26.1303, or evolutionary biology, would fall.


Check it out:


C'mon. You gotta admit, that's just a little bit suspicious?

1 Comments:

minimalist said...

Just to add another layer of tinfoil, I have to wonder if the other two "missing" categories are smokescreens to make it look like an accident, in case anyone ever noticed.

On the other hand, I can't imagine that the administration would do this without crowing about it to their fundie base (reality-denialists being their only supporters at this point, and boy do they need motivation). And I don't think any of the higher-ups have any internal motivation to do this -- they're ruthless businessmen who at least recognize the money-making utility of science. Except maybe Chimpy; he's possibly a creationist, but he's not making the decisions anyway.

Most likely it's not some grand conspiracy, but some nutcase mid-level functionary who managed to slip this by everyone. I don't think this will last.

10:50 AM, August 23, 2006

 

Post a Comment

<< Home