I can't believe I missed this. I was reading
the Scientific Activist and a saw that an article was published
last week in Science indicating a striking decrease in RO1 funding over the last few years. What is shocking isn't that RO1s are successful in acquiring funding, but how rapidly the rate of funding RO1s has dropped.
| Fate of unamended (unsolicited) R01 research grant applications |
|---|
| Fiscal year | Number submitted | Number awarded | Total $ awarded (millions) | Success rate (%) |
|---|
| Type-1 grants: new submissions |
|---|
| 1999 | 8957 | 1761 | 456 | 19.7 |
| 2000 | 8626 | 1736 | 503 | 20.1 |
| 2001 | 8284 | 1590 | 501 | 19.2 |
| 2002 | 8560 | 1556 | 510 | 18.2 |
| 2003 | 9605 | 1477 | 493 | 15.4 |
| 2004 | 10624 | 1288 | 438 | 12.1 |
| 2005 | 10605 | 970 | 351 | 9.1 |
| Type-2 grants: continuation (renewal) submissions |
|---|
| 1999 | 3214 | 1772 | 554 | 55.1 |
| 2000 | 3233 | 1708 | 563 | 52.8 |
| 2001 | 3100 | 1637 | 583 |
52.8 |
| 2002 | 3153 | 1555 | 559 |
49.3 |
| 2003 | 3767 | 1697 | 627 |
45.0 |
| 2004 | 3773 | 1530 | 580 | 40.6 |
| 2005 | 3896 | 1262 | 496 |
32.4 |
One should fear for any country that fails to maintain its investment in R&D. I can only hope when it comes time to try to get my first RO1 this situation will have reversed itself (in other words, we will have elected competent leadership).
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home