|
Give Up Blog - for scientists like these!
You hid my archives, didn't you Steve!
Maps and Figures "Hitler or Coulter?" QuizMap1 - Teen Pregnancy Map2 - Incarceration Map3 - Homicide Rates Map4 - Drop-out Rates Map5 - Bankruptcy Rates Map6 - Driving Distances Map7 - Energy Use Map8 - Gonorrhea! Map9 - Tax Burden Map10 - State GDP Map11 - DHS funding Map12 - Adult Illiteracy. Map13 - Abortion Bans: Map14 - ER Quality Map15 - Hospital Quality Map16 - Coal Burners Map 17 - Infant Mortality Map 18 - Toxic Waste Map 19 - Obesity Map 20 - Poverty Map 21 - Occupational safety Map 22 - Traffic deaths Map 23 - Divorce Figure 1 - Wages vs Right to work Figure 2 - Unemployment vs Right to work Give Up Shopping guide  
link to xml feed
|
Wednesday, January 31, 2007
Protesting
Readers of Give Up will note that I have contempt for the way our generation protests, and tried to point out good examples of what works. But then people like this guy show up, this is from NYC last year.
 Now, a lot of this reflects that when news organizations are going to cover events, they are going to be drawn to jackasses. That is not an excuse! When you go to a protest why are you doing it? The reasons I can think of:
I see the pictures of the protests on yahoo, and what do I see? The same old crap. I'm sure there are plenty of people there who don't look like jackasses, but based on the slideshow you see that we end up being represented by the worst possible people in the bunch. The only conclusion I can draw, putting myself in the shoes of those whose minds we seek to change, is that:
Some examples? Let's take a look at some of these pictures: From the AP, we have these protesters. Now looking at them, do you say let's hear what these guys have to say?  No? Why not? Was it the haircut? The unreadable signs? That when you do read the signs that they have nothing to do with protesting the surge in Iraq? The bandanas around their faces? What exactly is it about these two that make it so it would have been better if they hadn't even shown up? Oh yeah. Absolutely everything. Check out this from AP:  Great ladies, we appreciate your art skills, but do you think portraying them as bloodthirsty ghouls does much more than scare and confuse children? Remember, people in this country voted for these assholes, and don't get me wrong I hate them too, but the people whose minds you're trying to change see this and think you're calling them monsters too. Maybe that one's a little too subtle, let's go back to an easy one, from the AP:  So, when did it become a good idea to dress up like terrorists when you protest the war on terror? Once again we don't seem to be on message people. Oh God! This is the proof of my point! They only find the jackasses in the crowd because here in DC they found the same damn one!  The same guy, different protest, still gets picked up by AP no less, still wearing the mask but now he's got more blood on his hands. Now, this one from Reuters, what does this even mean? Are they pissed at the 18th century Spanish Galleons?  Sure enough the anarchists show up (anarchy meaning hating your parents because you're a teenager and they totally don't understand you). From the AP:  Oh, poor girl, they won't shake your hand, the demons! They must be responsible for Iraq, or your bedtime, or something. Maybe wearing stilts will change someone's mind! From AP:  To make it all worse, what celebrities will show up and guarantee a bunch of fodder for the wingers and contempt for the cause? Why Hanoi Jane and that guy who used to be married to Madonna. From Reuters:   Well now I'm convinced. The woman who sat on top of a Vietnamese anti-aircraft gun, in one of the most misguided efforts of all time to protest a war has joined our cause. Pardon me (sorry PZ) if I don't jump for joy at that one. I tried and I tried to find a good example of people present at this protest who represent how it should be done. How you do change people's minds. It was hard, but I did find one image. From the Washington Post slideshow(pops):  Now that's how you do it. None of the jackassery, none of the theater, none of the acting out which makes people think you're more interested in pissing off your parents than changing the world. A simple message, one from the heart. One that speaks to your humanity and your good reasons for wanting change. That's how you change minds. It reminds me a lot of these guys.  That's how it's done people. Until we can get people to show up for these things, on message, acting like normal human beings, behaving like adults, and generally putting the best face on our argument, our protests are going to be little more than blips on the radar screen of this administration. As long as we show up and demonstrate in a manner that will do nothing more than mobilize their base and alienate people, they're going to feel safe ignoring you. I realize marketing is seen as something evil, but at a protest you are marketing your ideas. Now is wearing bandanas, waving schizophrenic signs and hand-puppets the best way to market your ideas? Yeah, you'll get on the news, and AP will point a camera at you, but for the sake of the cause, I really wish they wouldn't. Once again, here are the three rules that should be obeyed by everybody at every protest.
It's not that hard people. When are we going to learn? |
7 Comments:
"#2 People should wear their best clothing. No one is too upset when an anarchist gets the snot beaten out of them. They get very upset when cops beat up men and women that look like them. So, dress like the people whose minds you are trying to change. Wear suits, dresses, and put on your best face. This is like a job interview for your idea of changing the world."
This sounds good but is actually silly.
1. people in power aren't upset by the beating of the disempowered regardless of what they're wearing. haven't you seen any other pictures from the birmingham civil rights movement other than the one you've got here? it doesn't matter if black folks are wearing their sunday best, if they get uppity we'll set the dogs on 'em.
2. not everyone has the same idea of dressing "well". do my shoes have to be made of leather to get sympathy from senators? if i'm a girl, should i wear a suit or a dress? fashion rules involve biases of class, age, gender, culture... telling everyone to wear a suit is speaking from a particular socioeconomic perspective. what if i, as a protestor, disapprove of that bougy perspective?
3. Finally, in order to have compassion and respect for someone, must I order them to look as much like me as possible?
Come on.
9:04 PM, January 31, 2007
Best clothing means whatever you think will make your idea most palatable to people. That's all. If all you've got is your work clothes, fine. But when you show up wearing all black with a bandana over your face, you lose sympathy.
And it was precisely because the freedom walkers were physically attacked and so sympathetic that their cause was so successful. When you spend your time setting dogs on women, shooting firehoses at people marching peacably, and jailing preachers, it's you that looks like the asshole. When you jail an anarchist or beat him on the street, most people will nod approvingly.
In terms of having compassion and respect for people who look different, this is not something I'm arguing against. I'm just saying the people whose minds you're trying to change will not be as receptive to protesters who are upsetting, scary or otherwise threatening to them. It's not about living in the world as if it's already perfect. It's acknowledging it isn't, and you're trying to bring people who disagree with you along. The type of people who disagree with us in this instance are not going to rally to the side of some kid wearing combat boots giving the finger to the cops.
It's not just about being right, it's about being able to appeal to those who wouldn't ordinarily listen to you. It's a challenge, it may require you act differently than you ordinarily would, but if it's important to you to change people's minds you should do your best to meet them half way.
9:16 PM, January 31, 2007
This post has been removed by the author.
9:33 PM, January 31, 2007
People should wear their best clothing. ... This is like a job interview for your idea of changing the world.
Whatever happened to women ripping their clothes off in protest?
The new world order is too uptight.
12:41 AM, February 01, 2007
Sometimes uptight is good for your argument. You're trying to change the mind of uptight people.
1:01 AM, February 01, 2007
Sometimes uptight is good for your argument. You're trying to change the mind of uptight people.
You don't sound uptight in your posts.
I gave up trying to change the minds of uptight people. They're either politically conservative or academically conservative. Takes too much effort to change their minds.
That's why God also invented violence. For the lazy of us.
1:10 AM, February 01, 2007
I gave up too. Partly because no matter how thoughtful or well arguments are presented to my opponents, some moron next to me will be carrying a Bush=Satan sign while wearing a bandana over their face and flipping off the camera.
Give up is about letting people realize their mistakes on their own. It's a lot like psychotherapy I guess. You can tell people what their problems are, but until they have their very own personal revelation, what you say doesn't sink in. But, once they do have that moment of illumination, suddenly they'll say, sheesh, maybe pissing all over my own interests, electing idiots, and blowing up the middle East wasn't such a hot plan. Give Up was right after all.
Then we sit back, polish our glasses, then steeple our fingers and ask, "how does that make you feel?"
(like voting Democrat)
1:28 AM, February 01, 2007
Post a Comment
<< Home